From firearms-alert-owner Mon Jan 16 14:54:35 1995
Received: (chan@localhost) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) id OAA09151 for firearms-alert-outgoing; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 14:36:45 -0800
Received: (chan@localhost) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) id OAA09134 for firearms-alert; Mon, 16 Jan 1995 14:36:42 -0800
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 1995 14:36:42 -0800
From: Jeff Chan <chan>
Message-Id: <199501162236.OAA09134@jobe.shell.portal.com>
To: firearms-alert
Subject: GOA: Support HR 464, Bartlett's ban repeal
Sender: firearms-alert-owner@shell.portal.com
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO

[Brad, please include firearms-alert in the distribution of *any*
alert from Larry Pratt.  His alerts are excellent.  Note: Chapman's
HR 125 is being supported by other pro-rights people.  -- Jeff C.]
__

>Date: Sat, 14 Jan 1995 21:02:31 -0600 (CST)
>From: Brad Alpert <balpert@TYRELL.NET>
>To: roc@xmission.com
>Subject: Just in from GOA
>
>Mr. Pratt just uploaded this alert to my node of the Paul Revere
>Network.  Please crosspost widely.
>
>                    ----------------------------------------
>
>>From    : LARRY PRATT                            Number    : 1534 of 1534
>To      : ALL                                    Date      : 01/14/95 8:52pm
>Subject : Support Gun Ban Repeal!                Reference : NONE
>Read    : [N/A]                                  Private   : NO
>Conf    : 001 - PR_NET
>
>               Repeal the Assault Weapons Ban!
>      Calls needed to support Bartlett - Stockman bill
>
>                            by
>
>                   Gun Owners of America
>
>
>     (January 14, 1995) -- This week, Rep. Roscoe Bartlett (R-MD)
>and Rep. Steve Stockman (R-TX) introduced H.R. 464 -- a bill to
>repeal the gun control provisions in the Crime Bill.
>
>     It is imperative that you call your Congressman and ask them to
>cosponsor this bill!
>
>     It is also important that you ask your Congressman to not
>cosponsor an alternative bill introduced by Rep. Jim Chapman
>(D-TX).  His bill would also repeal the gun control provisions,
>but it is important that the Bartlett/Stockman bill get as many
>cosponsors as possible so that their bill is the one that Congress
>considers.
>
>     Here's why:  Rep. Chapman is not a gun rights supporter!  He is
>a gun control advocate who received a D rating from GOA before
>the election.  But he is from Texas, so this bill might be a way
>for him to appease pro-gun voters in his district.  Consider
>Chapman's voting record:
>
>     * Rep. Chapman voted for the Crime Bill on August 21, 1994.  In
>other words, Chapman actually voted to help pass the assault
>weapons ban!
>
>     * On May 5, 1994, Rep. Chapman voted for the "rule" to bring
>the assault weapons ban to the House floor for debate.  He might
>claim that Democrats like himself typically support these "rule"
>votes.  But the truth is that real pro-gun Democrats will vote
>against these rule votes if it means killing an anti-gun bill.
>Pro-gun Democrats like Rep. Harold Volkmer (MO) and Rep. Pete
>Geren (TX) are just two examples.  Last May 5, Democrats like
>Volkmer and Geren put principle ahead of their Party and voted
>against the rule.  That is, they voted against bringing the
>assault weapons ban to the House floor for a vote.
>
>     * Rep. Chapman voted for the Brady bill on November 10, 1993.
>Also on that same day, he voted against a preemption amendment
>that would have struck down state waiting periods and licensing
>laws that were stricter than the Brady bill.
>
>     We could go on and on.  But here's the point:  Rep. Chapman is
>not the one to take the lead on repealing the ban.  When it
>comes time for negotiations, we need people like Reps. Bartlett
>and Stockman -- people who are principled; people who have
>already shown themselves to be pro-gun stalwarts; people who
>will tell the leadership, "We will not compromise!"
>
>     Remember, during the fight to pass the McClure-Volkmer bill,
>Sen. McClure came under tremendous pressure to compromise.  As
>the lead sponsor, he was the one who would negotiate over
>specific provisions in the bill.  McClure was pro-gun and yet
>there were times when he should have remained tougher and stood
>his ground.
>
>     Can we count on Rep. Chapman to stand his ground when the
>offers to compromise begin?  Chapman is a Democrat -- can we
>count on him to put President Clinton on the spot?
>
>     HERE'S WHAT YOU NEED TO DO:
>
>     * Call your Representative (202-225-3121) and ask him to
>cosponsor H.R. 464 -- the Bartlett/Stockman bill.  Ask him NOT
>to cosponsor the Chapman bill, H.R. 125.  Use Chapman's votes
>listed above if you need to.  But let your Congressman know that
>Chapman has not been with us in the past.  Rep. Bartlett has
>already shown he's with us -- he's an A rated Congressman.  And
>the A rated freshman, Rep. Stockman, has already shown himself
>to be one of the most uncompromising fighters in the House.
>
>     This alert was posted by Gun Owners of America, 8001 Forbes
>Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA  22151, (703)321-8585,
>fax: (703)321-8408.  We still are not set up to respond to e-mail.
>
>PAUL REVERE NETWORK/CENTRAL (816) 597-3950

