From latzko@ns1.rutgers.edu Wed Feb 23 14:54:53 1994
Received: from demon.corp.portal.com (demon.corp.portal.com [156.151.1.10]) by jobe.shell.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA09849 for <chan@shell.portal.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 14:54:52 -0800
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com (nova.unix.portal.com [156.151.1.101]) by demon.corp.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) with ESMTP id OAA11698 for <chan@corp.portal.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 14:55:25 -0800
Received: from ns1.rutgers.edu (ns1.rutgers.edu [128.6.21.6]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.4/8.6.4) with SMTP id OAA08152 for <chan@corp.portal.com>; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 14:54:49 -0800
Received: by ns1.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) 
	id AA16205; Wed, 23 Feb 94 17:49:24 EST
Received: from motgate.mot.com by ns1.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) 
	id AA16191; Wed, 23 Feb 94 17:49:16 EST
Received: from pobox.mot.com ([129.188.137.100]) by motgate.mot.com with SMTP (5.67b/IDA-1.4.4/MOT-3.1 for <firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu>)
          id AA28891; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 16:49:14 -0600
Received: from mdd.comm.mot.com (mdisea.mdd.comm.mot.com) by pobox.mot.com with SMTP (5.67b/IDA-1.4.4/MOT-3.1 for <firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu>)
          id AA02933; Wed, 23 Feb 1994 16:49:12 -0600
Received: from dragon.mdd.comm.mot.com by mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA28916; Wed, 23 Feb 94 14:49:10 PST
Received: from phoenix.mdd.comm.mot.com by dragon.mdd.comm.mot.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA01248; Wed, 23 Feb 94 14:49:08 PST
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 94 14:49:08 PST
From: booth@mdd.comm.mot.com (Greg Booth)
Message-Id: <9402232249.AA01248@dragon.mdd.comm.mot.com>
To: firearms-politics@ns1.rutgers.edu
Subject: COMMENTS ON KELLERMANN - GUNS IN THE HOME
Status: RO


From:
"H. Taylor Buckner, Sociology, Concordia U., (514) 848-2137, BUCKNER@VAX2.CONCORDIA.CA."


      Some Methodological Problems in "Gun Ownership and
      Homicide in the Home - (Kellermann et. al., New
      England Journal of Medicine. Oct 7, 1993)

                      H. Taylor Buckner
              Associate Professor of Sociology
                    Concordia University

      Kellermann and his colleagues concluded that a person who
had a gun in his or her home was 2.7 times more likely to be a victim
of homicide than someone who did not (1087).  They further "found
no evidence of a protective benefit from gun ownership...(1087)." 
Neither of these conclusions are justified on the basis of their
research.

      They conducted their research by limiting their cases to
people murdered in their own homes, thus excluding any instances
where intruders were killed by the homeowner.  They did not ask
the victim's proxy (from whom they got their data about the victim
and his or her household) whether or not the victim had previously
defended him/herself with a gun.  Thus their conclusion that a gun
provides no protective benefit flows from their failure to consider
cases where it might have.

      In order to provide a control group they selected another
person from the neighborhood of the same sex, race, and age group
as the victim, and asked them the same questions they had asked
the victim's proxy.  While matched on the demographic variables,
the control group was stunningly different on behavioral measures. 
Compared to the control group the victim group was more likely to:
rent rather than own, live alone, drink alcoholic beverages, have
problems in the household because of drinking, have trouble at
work because of drinking, be hospitalized because of drinking, use
illicit drugs, have physical fights in the home during drinking,
have a household member hit or hurt in a fight in the home, have a
household member require medical attention because of a fight in
the home, have a household member involved in a physical fight
outside the home, have any household member arrested, and be
arrested themselves.  Thus the victim group and the control group
had very different lifestyles, with the victim group living a very
high-risk lifestyle.  

      In fact, Kellermann found that having a gun in the home
ranked fifth out of six risk factors in the victims' lives.  Using
illicit drugs lead to a 5.7 times risk of being murdered, being a
renter 4.4 times, having any household member hit or hurt in a
fight 4.4 times, living alone 3.7 times, guns in the household 2.7
times, and a household member being arrested, 2.5 times.

      The entire "gun in the home is risky" analysis depends on
one crucial figure, the percent of the control group (35.8%) that
have guns in their homes.  If this figure is underreported, the
findings are false.  There is good reason to assume this figure is
low.  First, many, many surveys report that around 48% of
Americans have guns in their homes.  The victim group, as
reported by their proxies, had 45.4% gun owners.  This figure is
unlikely to be false: the victim is dead, in 49.9% of the cases by
gunshot wound, the proxy cannot really lie about it.  The control
group actually reported owning more rifles and shotguns than the
victim group, (fewer handguns) but they may well have not
reported having a pistol in the home because it is illegal, or
nobody's business.  There is considerable evidence (Kleck, 457;
Newton, 6; Erskine, 456; Kennett, 253; Stinchcombe, 115) that
over the past three decades an increasing fraction of survey
respondents have incorrectly denied gun ownership.  In a pilot
study, Kellermann tested whether people reported their gun
ownership correctly by asking REGISTERED gun owners if they
owned a gun, and found that their replies were "generally valid
(1089)."  The official records of the members of the control group
were not checked to see if they had "registered" guns, and likely
many had guns that were not registered and not reported.  Thus
even the finding that gun ownership is the fifth most important risk
factor is subject to considerable doubt.

      My conclusion is that this study is seriously flawed, and that
the conclusions were driven by ideology more than research.

                         References

Erskine, Hazel.
1972. "The Polls: Gun Control."  Public Opinion Quarterly. 36:455-
      469.

Kellermann, Arthur L., M.D., M.P.H., Frederick P. Rivara, M.D.,
M.P.H., Norman B. Rushforth, Ph.D., Joyce G. Banton, M.S.,
Donald T. Reay, M.D., Jerry T. Francisco, M.D., Ana B. Locci,
Ph.D., Jancice Prodzinzki, B.A., Bela B. Hackman, M.D., and
Grant Somes, Ph.D.
1993  "Gun Ownership as a Risk Factor for Homicide in the Home." 
      New England Journal of Medicine. 329:15 1084-1091. 7 Oct.

Kennett, Lee and James LaVerne Anderson.
1975. The Gun in America: The Origins of a National Dilemma.
      Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.

Kleck, Gary.
1991. Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America. New York:
      Aldine de Gruyter.

Newton, George D., and Frank Zimring.
1969. Firearms and Violence in American Life.  A Staff Report to
      the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of
      Violence.  Washington, D.C.; U.S. Government Printing
      Office.

Stinchcombe, Arthur, Rebecca Adams, Carol A. Heimer, Kim Lane
Schepple, Tom W. Smith, and D. Garth Taylor.
1980. Crime and Punishment - Changing Attitudes in America.  San
      Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

