From: WIENER.GCS@pc.gcs.litton.com (WIENER, DAN x3708) To: firearms-alert@shell.portal.com (wiener) Subject: MEDIA: "GOVERNING" article Date: Wed, 08 Mar 95 09:05 Just as a matter of general interest, the March 1995 issue of "GOVERNING: The Magazine of States and Localities" has a cover story titled "The Gun Lobby Reloads". "GOVERNING" is a monthly trade magazine (with a controlled circulation of 85,000) published by Congressional Quarterly, Inc. that's available free to qualified city and state elected officials and top bureaucrats. The article is actually a very objective description of recent political trends: "The NRA and its allies are promising a major offensive to roll back recent gun control gains. Given the election victories of 1994, there is every reason to believe that they will get much of what they want." The article goes on to describe the complete reversal that took place in Washington State. While mentioning other factors involved in the Republican landslide, it concedes that "any way you look at it, the gun lobby's fingerprints are all over the takeover of the Washington house." Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Bellevue, Washington-based Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, is quoted extensively. The article notes that "Over the past two years, even in states where the NRA once dominated the political landscape, gun control supporters racked up triumph after legislative triumph. With polls reflecting widespread public support for gun restrictions, even states with stong pro-gun traditions - Washington, Colorado, Utah, California, Pennsylvania, Texas - began passing and considering restrictions that would have been unheard of in years past." "It was proof, gun control supporters and the media gleefully concluded, that the gun lobby, once known for its obstinance and muscle in state capitols, was in decline." Then the story describes how Democrats misjudged support for stricter laws, often based on their internal polls: "'The polls show 60 to 65 percent support an assault weapons ban. That's true,' says Senator Adam Smith, a Democrat who was then chairman of the [Washington State] judiciary committee. 'But the intensity of the opposition is far greater than the intensity of the support.'" The article goes on to talk about the "fine-tuned political machine" of the gun lobby in Washington State: "Drawing from subscriber lists for hunting and firearms magazines, gun club membership rosters, gun dealer sales records and, ironically, names drawn from state background-check records on firearms purchasers, the gun lobby matched phone numbers to 180,000 voters, each of whom received a call... The final tally was an electoral debacle for Washington State Democrats. In contested state legislative races, 50 of 70 NRA-endorsed candidates won office. On the other hand, candidates backed by Washington Ceasefire, the state's largest gun control lobby, were creamed. Their endorsed candidates won only in Seattle-area districts." The article concludes with a quote from Alan Gottlieb: "Quite frankly, I welcome another assault weapons vote in the Senate. It allows us to define who the anti-gunners are and go back after them again in the next election." There is also an excellent half-page table listing the status of gun-control (gun bans/state firearm preemption laws/provisions for concealed carry) in all the states as of June, 1994; the information source is the NRA Institute for Legislative Action. This was a very valuable article in that it pounded home the message to its select audience (state and local elected officials) that rumors of the death of the gun lobby's clout are greatly exaggerated. Most elections are won or lost on the margin: just a few percentage points can make all the difference. Elected officials who might violate our 2nd Amendment rights need to be frequently reminded that RKBA supporters really do make that difference, and that we can and will end their political careers. -- Dan Wiener (wiener@pc.gcs.litton.com)