Jeff Chan xxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx chan@shell.portal.com March 28, 1994 Editor San Francisco Examiner Fax: (415) 512-1264 Editor: Lisa Krieger's 3/27 front page piece on the Roberti recall contains at least a couple obvious errors of fact. First, Roberti didn't ban "automatic weapons." Machine guns have been essentially unavailable in California since 1934 except to the police and movie industry. This deliberate distortion can be traced back to a March 1989 paper by Josh Sugarman titled "Assault Weapon: Analysis, New Research and Legislation." In it Sugarman recommends exploiting: "...the public's confusion over fully-automatic machine guns versus semi-automatic assault weapons [sic] -- anything that looks like a machine gun is assumed to be a machine gun..." Even the term "assault weapon" is itself newspeak. The United States Department of Defense officially classifies an assault rifle as a select fire rifle (i.e. one that can fire one round per trigger pull or multiple rounds -- a machine gun). A "semi-automatic assault weapon" is as much an oxymoron as a manual automatic transmission or a crooked honest politician. Krieger's repeated perpetuation of this lie suggests bias and dishonesty that should call into question the competence and journalistic ability of both her and her editor. Second, if by "gun lobby" the Examiner suggests that the NRA is behind the recall, then it is again in error. The recall is made possible by thousands of grass roots citizens from across the country who are concerned about corruption, victim's rights, taxation, crime control and firearms rights. They have independently volunteered to mail some letters about the recall into Roberti's district. These concerned citizens and the 40,000+ voters in Roberti's district who signed the recall petitions represent more than "the gun lobby". They represent voter frustration with a powerful, corrupt, entrenched career politician. Sincerely, [signature] Jeff Chan